Atlanta Constitution
July 11, 2000  
COKE CAN MAKE ENVIRONMENT SMILE
Edwin R. Stafford and Cathy L. Hartman - Special
Coca-Cola is to be commended for its recent 
announcement that the company will phase out all cold 
drink equipment using global warming 
hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) as refrigerants or insulation 
by the 2004 Athens Summer Olympic Games. 
Chairman Douglas Daft declared that the company 
would expand its research to test environmentally safer 
refrigeration alternatives and require suppliers to use 
only HFC-free appliances and equipment that are at 
least 40 percent more energy efficient than today's 
standards. Although the announcement was made with 
little fanfare, its impact will be profound, catalyzing a 
greener future for refrigeration. 
Daft's decision comes in response to environmental 
watchdog Greenpeace's charges that, as a 2000 Sydney 
Olympics sponsor, the soft drink maker was breaking 
the "Green Games" environmental guidelines 
prohibiting HFCs at Olympic sites. 
Over the past decade, Greenpeace has crusaded to 
eradicate HFCs and other ozone depleting and global 
warming chemicals from the refrigeration industry. 
Greenpeace helped draft the Sydney Olympic's HFC-
free environmental guidelines, which formed an 
integral part of that city's bid to serve as host. 
To date, however, the Sydney Olympic Coordination 
Authority has not enforced its mandate, and Greenpeace 
has turned to pressuring key Olympic sponsors directly 
to adopt HFC-free chillers for serving their foods and 
beverages. Greenpeace published an expose describing 
Coca-Cola as a "dirty Olympic sponsor" last April. 
Greenpeace credits Coca-Cola's change of heart to its 
new chairman's management style. Daft has been 
reaching out to those who have been disenfranchised by 
the soft drink maker in recent years under his more 
contentious predecessor, M. Douglas Ivester. In the 
wake of a variety of corporate missteps, including a 
tainted Coke scare in Europe last year and racial and 
morale problems at home, Daft is attempting to restore 
goodwill with governments, investors, employees and 
the public. 
Building bridges to the environmental community to 
restore Coke's reputation appears to be a priority. 
Coca-Cola's HFC decision could be the most important 
legacy of Sydney's Green Olympic Games. What is so 
remarkable is how a large, established firm can become 
an environmental maverick and send shock waves 
through an industry. 
Greenpeace's cooperative activism has paid off for both 
the environment and its corporate allies. Since 1993, the 
campaign has created markets to help sell over 40 
million "greenfreeze" refrigerators. Greenfreeze is now 
the dominant technology in Europe, and it has made 
significant inroads in China, India and other developing 
nations. North America, however, has been holding out. 
Appliance manufacturers and the chemical industry 
have resisted greenfreeze because it is a threat to 
profits. Greenfreeze is composed of existing propane 
and isobutane gases, which are in the public domain 
and cost about one-twentieth the price of HFCs. The 
chemical industry has also sounded the alarm about 
greenfreeze's potential flammability. Safety isn't really 
the issue, however, since the amount of gas for a 
domestic refrigerator is about twice of what is 
contained in a cigarette lighter. Much greater fire 
hazards can be found in most kitchens in the form of 
gas stoves. 
Coca-Cola's requiring suppliers and distributors to 
adopt all new HFC-free chillers by 2004 will drive 
innovation and initiate a domino effect to topple North 
America's HFC regime. 
The public needs to keep Coca-Cola to its word, 
however. The company has reneged on its 
environmental pledges in the past, including a 1990 
promise to use 25 percent recycled plastic in its bottles. 
Only this past April did Coca-Cola commit to 10 
percent recycled plastic for this year. Daft has the 
opportunity to continue positioning his company as an 
environmental maverick so the world can enjoy a Coke 
and a greener and cleaner future. 
Edwin R. Stafford and Cathy L. Hartman are marketing 
professors at Utah State University. 
Other Archives - Generated on : Tue Jul 11 2000 - 09:02:07 EDT