My persona goal this year: to always bring my bag, even to the drug store,
etc. Success rate: about 80%!
HEIDI FELDMAN
PUBLIC EDUCATION COORDINATOR
MONTEREY REGIONAL WASTE MANAGEMENT DISTRICT
e-mail: hfeldman@mrwmd.org
Tel.: 831/384-5313 FAX: 831/384-3567
"Too many people today know the price of everything and the value of
nothing." Ann Landers
-----Original Message-----
From: Myra Nissen [mailto:myracycl@inreach.com]
Sent: Monday, March 29, 1999 8:22 PM
To: greenyes; crra
Cc: JudiGregry@aol.com
Subject: Re: paper vs plastic
I still like the store policy implemented by Community Foods in Santa
Cruz, CA in the late 1970's... You were charged 5 cents for every new
bag that you used from the store's supply. If you brought and used a
used bag, you were not charged.
Myra Nissen
myracycl@inreach.com
510-873-8777
____________________Reply Separator____________________
> Subject: paper vs plastic
> Author: JudiGregry@aol.com
> Date: 3/27/99 11:01 AM
>
> From: JudiGregry@aol.com
> Date: Sat, Mar 27, 1999 11:01 AM
> Subject: paper vs plastic
> To: crra; greenyes
> Dear members,
>
> I read an article last week that disturbed me and was hoping I could get
some
> help. It was regarding the usage of paper or plastic bags at the grocery
> store. Here's a quick summary of the article....
>
> basically, the article said that both were bad because paper bags are
made
> from virgin materials (trees) and plastic is made from petroleum sources
(also
> virgin materials). Then it went on to say that neither were recycled
after
> use. And finally it said that if one had to choose, that plastic would be
> better because even though the paper biodegrades in the landfill faster
than
> the plastc, that the plastic takes up less landfill space.
>
> This article has really disturbed me. I went and checked some paper bags
I
> had at home and found that Lucky bags show 50% post consumer content and
> Kinko's shows 20% post consumer, while my Lucky plastic bag showed no
recycled
> content. I also know that plastic bags have been extremely difficult to
> recycle with many people noticing the bags dropped off for recycling only
end
> up in trash cans. I have been under the assumption that paper bags are
widely
> made from recycled content and that they are also accepted for recycling
by
> most curbside recycling programs and processors. I'd like to think that
I'm
> doing the right thing by choosing paper over plasic, but would love to
hear
> what you think.
>
> Judi Gregory
> 626-339-9555
> judigregry@aol.com
>
> ----------
> Received: from mlist.ucsd.edu by paris.fabrik.com
> with SMTP (Fabrik F07.3-000)
> id SINN.12629833@paris.fabrik.com ; Sat, 27 Mar 1999
11:06:39 -0800
> Received: from mailbox2.ucsd.edu (mailbox2.ucsd.edu [132.239.1.54]) by
> mlist.ucsd.edu (8.8.8AS/8.6.9) with ESMTP id LAA15603; Sat, 27 Mar 1999
> 11:01:53 -0800 (PST)
> Received: from imo19.mx.aol.com (imo19.mx.aol.com [198.81.17.9])
> by mailbox2.ucsd.edu (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA20256
> for <crra@ucsd.edu>; Sat, 27 Mar 1999 11:01:53 -0800 (PST)
> From: JudiGregry@aol.com
> Received: from JudiGregry@aol.com
> by imo19.mx.aol.com (IMOv19.3) id 1IJRa07227;
> Sat, 27 Mar 1999 14:01:05 -0500 (EST)
> Message-ID: <73fc2b34.36fd2af1@aol.com>
> Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1999 14:01:05 EST
> To: greenyes@earthsystems.org, crra@ucsd.edu
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Subject: paper vs plastic
> Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
> Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
> X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Windows 95 sub 13
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
> ----------